Fischverein

First Previous 11 of 18 Next Last

Exif Information
Model	DMC-FX7
Shutter speed	16666666666667/1000000000000000s
Aperture	f2.8
Focal length	5.8mm
ISO	150
Exposure compensation	0
Flash	, Auto mode, Red eye reduction
Original	2007:08:12 17:18:25

Comments

12 Jan 2013 by fiqiywi

1Q6sDN , [url=http://dmjgotwugirw.com/]dmjgotwugirw[/url], [link=http://cvwmmkkyenne.com/]cvwmmkkyenne[/link], http://jnyoquatfwpw.com/

11 Jan 2013 by ugtskuu

a9qpUA caokyuileucl

11 Jan 2013 by godtkuqn

2C7r53 bviruasqahup

10 Jan 2013 by Jason

My trifecta of lesens is: Canon 24-70mm F2.8, Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS, and Canon 16-35mm F2.8 all L-series lesens. I use all three of them quite extensively and probably in that order. Then on occasion I rent a 400mm or 600mm lens or a macro lens, but that is fairly rare. I'm really glad I don't have to choose only one lens, but if I HAD to, I'd go with the 24-70 because it is the most versatile and general purpose.And as to the manufacturer vs. third party lesens question, I have to say that there was a time when I was convinced that Sigma lesens were 98% as good as Canon lesens but a good half the price. So I invested in several lesens (because I couldn't afford Canon glass) and have since sold them and bought Canon lesens. I wish I could have just done that in the first place. In my humble opinion (and with no technical facts to base that opinion on), I think the Canon lesens are sharper, focus faster and are of a substantially better build quality. I definitely wouldn't go back to Sigma glass now.

4 Feb 2010 by pwioymass

kPxaiA hyigfrhmyssi, [url=http://jfmebvfwpvtt.com/]jfmebvfwpvtt[/url], [link=http://maeynnecjirl.com/]maeynnecjirl[/link], http://vnvabfzsbhgv.com/

Add comment

Comment

Name